Fifteen titles, every one of them true to your draft

Paste the draft, not the topic

Most title generators are given three words and asked to perform. What comes back is a headline about a subject rather than a headline about your article, and it usually promises something the page does not deliver.

This one accepts up to 1,200 characters of real content, and that is the point. Give it two or three paragraphs of what you actually wrote and the titles come back describing your specific argument, your angle, and the thing that makes your piece different from the ten others on the same subject. Give it a two-word topic and you will get generic output, because generic input is all it had.

The generator is also instructed not to introduce facts, numbers or claims your input does not support. That constraint matters more than it sounds: a headline promising "7 ways" when your article has four is the fastest route to a bounce, and it is exactly what an unconstrained model will produce when it is guessing at content it was never shown.

The five styles, and when each one earns its place

Every title comes back tagged, so you are comparing like with like instead of wondering why one option reads differently from the rest.

• Clear — states the subject plainly, no device. The safest choice for reference material and documentation, and the one that ages best.
• How-to — promises a method. Strong when your article genuinely walks through steps, weak when it only discusses a topic.
• Listicle — signals a countable set. Only use it if the count in the title matches the count in the piece.
• Question — mirrors the phrasing people actually search with, which is why it often matches query intent closely.
• Benefit — leads with the outcome rather than the subject. Effective for landing pages, riskier for editorial, where it can overpromise.

Most titles are kept under 70 characters, which is roughly where search results start truncating. That is a guideline the generator follows rather than a hard cut, so check anything that runs long before you publish it.

Why generated headlines are easy to spot

There is a vocabulary that has become shorthand for machine-written copy. Delve. Ultimate. Unleash. Skyrocket. Elevate. Game-changing. Readers who spend any time online have learned to read those words as a signal that nobody edited the page, and once that impression lands, the article underneath starts from behind.

This generator is steered away from that register explicitly, and towards plain human phrasing. It is a small constraint with an outsized effect, because the tell in AI writing is rarely a factual error. It is tone: uniform, slightly inflated, reaching for emphasis the content has not earned.

The same pattern shows up in body copy, just more diffusely. If you drafted the article with an assistant, the AI detector will show you which sentences carry it, and the AI rewriter will help you fix those specific lines. A strong title on a templated article is still a templated article.

How to actually choose one

1. Read it as a stranger. If you had never seen the article, would this title tell you what you get? Ambiguity you can fill in from memory is ambiguity a reader cannot.
2. Check the promise against the piece. Every number, every "how to", every superlative has to be something the article delivers.
3. Say it out loud. Titles that are awkward to speak are usually awkward to read, and they perform badly when shared.
4. Pick two, not one. Keep a second option for the social post or the email subject line. They rarely want the same phrasing.

If nothing in the set works, add more of your draft and run it again rather than regenerating on the same input. The generator caches identical requests, so the same input tends to give you the same thinking. New content is what produces new angles.

Limits and honest caveats

• Free is 3 a day anonymously, 5 with a free account, 25 on Starter, unlimited on Pro and above. Each run returns up to 15 titles.
• Input is capped at 1,200 characters. Longer drafts are trimmed, so paste the section that best represents the piece rather than the opening boilerplate.
• It is a drafting aid, not an editor. Read every option before you publish one. A title is a claim your page has to keep.
• Identical input returns cached output. That keeps it fast and free, but it means regenerating without changing anything gives you the same set.
• English is where it is strongest, in line with the rest of the TextSight toolset.

Related free tools

• Essay Outline Generator — structure before you write a word.
• AI Summarizer — pull the key points out of any text.
• Paraphraser — reword a passage without losing the meaning.
• Readability Checker — see whether your draft reads as easily as you think.
• Grammar Checker — the pass before you publish.
• AI writing assistants compared — 19 tools, and the check none of them run.