Students, writers, SEO teams, educators, enterprises — each gets a workflow tuned to their stakes and their stakeholders.
Most universities now run essays through Turnitin or GPTZero. False positives happen. Use TextSight to see exactly what those tools will see, fix the AI tells, and submit with confidence.
You use AI to draft fast — that's not the problem. The problem is publishing something that reads like AI. Run your final draft through TextSight, fix the tells, keep your voice.
Google's Helpful Content Update punished AI slop. If your library shipped on autopilot in 2023–24, half of it might be a liability. Bulk-scan, find the worst offenders, fix them via API.
A single percentage doesn't survive a meeting with a furious parent. TextSight gives you per-sentence scores, model attribution, and a forensic PDF that holds up in academic-integrity hearings.
Newsrooms, publishers, agencies, HR teams, hiring funnels. Anywhere AI-generated content might slip in and cost you trust — TextSight gives you the audit trail, the API, and the SLA.
Whether you're scanning an essay, a client deliverable, a 30-student stack of submissions, or 100 SEO articles a week — these six capabilities ship on every plan.
Doesn't just give you one score — colour-codes every sentence so you know exactly which lines triggered. That's critical for defending a flagged paper, rewriting an article efficiently, or showing a client which sections need work.
Five clear bands: Original, Mostly Human, Mixed, Likely AI, AI Generated. No confidence percentages to interpret. You see one number and immediately know whether to ship, revise, or rewrite.
Trained on GPT-4, Claude, Gemini, Llama and Mistral outputs — not just one. Many detectors miss Claude content because they're calibrated only on GPT data. TextSight catches all of them.
Right-click any text on any website to scan it inline. Works on Gmail, Google Docs, Notion, LMS portals, X drafts. The fastest way to check content without leaving your current tab.
Scan posts inside the WP editor before publishing. Useful for editors managing contributor submissions and SEO teams shipping content at volume.
For developers and agencies building detection into their own products. Character-based daily pricing, streaming AI rewriter endpoint, transparent rate limits. Documented at api-docs.
The most common path is to start with one detector, get frustrated by an unexplained flag, then add a second tool, then a third. Here's why one well-built tool with sentence-level reasoning beats a stack of opaque scorers.
You probably don't need to switch. Run TextSight alongside it for the cases where Originality returns an opaque number you can't act on. The sentence-level highlights make the cost of revision visible: you can see exactly which 4 sentences in a 600-word paragraph need rewriting, rather than rewriting the whole thing on faith.
They are wrong sometimes. So is every classifier in the world. The right question is whether the tool tells you why it scored the way it did, so you can disagree with reasoning when you need to. TextSight gives you the sentence-by-sentence breakdown; many competitors give you a single number with no breadcrumb.
Turnitin is the institutional gatekeeper, not the only opinion. Students and writers use TextSight as a pre-submission cross-check to catch sentences that would draw a Turnitin flag, and to rewrite sentences that drift into stiff AI register before the official scan ever runs.
No. The free tier is for evaluation and very low-volume personal use. At 100 articles a week, look at the Business tier with the REST API, 5 team seats, and bulk PDF export. The math typically lands at a fraction of what credit-priced competitors cost at the same volume.
If the goal is to disguise AI use, yes — and we explicitly do not recommend that workflow. The legitimate case for authenticity is improving prose that was AI-assisted: cutting stiff Latin verbs, varying sentence length, removing hedges. Better writing is better writing whether the first draft came from a person or a model. The detector exists to flag when a piece reads as undisclosed AI content; the AI rewriter exists to help writers ship prose that does not.
Google's helpful-content guidance already focuses on whether the content is useful to readers, regardless of who wrote the first draft. TextSight doesn't exempt anyone from that bar. What it does is help you ship prose that's genuinely useful and reads natural, so your pages aren't on the wrong side of either reader expectations or future model updates. The teams who treat AI as a drafting aid and finish the work themselves have nothing to worry about either way.
Most free detectors run on out-of-date single-model training, which explains the nonsense. TextSight's free tier uses the same multi-model classifier as the paid tiers, so the accuracy you see on a free scan is the same accuracy you get at Business volume. The only thing that changes between tiers is daily volume, file upload, REST API access, and team-seat features.
Free for everyone. Tuned for whatever you're trying to ship.