HomeAI Detector › Free Accurate

Free AI detector with accurate sentence-level evidence on free tier.

Most free AI detectors hand you a single percentage and hope you do not ask where it came from. TextSight Free runs the same classifier Pro runs, surfaces sentence-level evidence on every scan, and keeps the result page clear of ads. Three scans a day at 5,000 characters each, no card and no email required for your first scan, and the same ESL calibration that drops false positives by about 40 percent versus uncalibrated detectors. Accuracy on the free tier matches paid tiers within rounding because there is no separate free-tier model. Only the daily quota differs.

Run a free accurate scan See the workflow
Same classifier as Pro Sentence-level highlights on free ESL false positives 40% lower
What free includes

Free tier scope, honestly listed.

Three scans a day, 5,000 characters per scan, and the full evidence panel. The numbers below are exactly what you get on the free tier with no upgrade gate.

3 scans per day

Resets on a rolling daily window. Three scans cover the most common cases the free tier serves: a pre-submission essay check, a freelance deliverable review, and a quick sanity pass on a short article. Heavier daily volume is the line where free moves into Starter or Pro, but it is also the line where ad-funded free clones start to break.

5,000 characters per scan

Roughly 800 words. Long enough to cover most essays, blog posts, and product descriptions in a single scan. Documents over 5,000 characters can be split into sections, or run through the higher per-scan cap on Pro at 10,000 characters. The free per-scan cap is a real cap, not a teaser-grade quota that hides the actual usable text length.

Sentence-level highlights on every scan

Green for human, yellow for borderline, red for AI. Every sentence carries the specific signals that triggered its colour, so a global score is always paired with the underlying evidence. This is the feature most free competitors gate behind paid plans, and the reason their free percentages feel unactionable.

Plagiarism Risk indicator

Returned alongside the Authenticity Score on the same scan. A simple flag highlighting passages with a higher chance of overlap against indexed sources. Not a full plagiarism report (that lives in the Plagiarism tool), but enough to know whether the AI score is the only thing worth thinking about for a given piece.

Accuracy on free

Same model as Pro, same accuracy bands.

There is no quiet downgrade on the free tier. The classifier, the calibration, and the scoring scale all match the paid tiers within rounding. Only the daily quota differs.

Around 89 percent on long-form text

On unedited model output of 500 words or longer, the classifier sits at roughly 89 percent across mixed model families (GPT-4, GPT-4o, GPT-5, Claude 3, Claude 3.5, Gemini 1.5, Gemini 2.0, Llama 3). Long-form is where detection has the most statistical signal to work with, and where the published number is most reliable.

Around 82 percent on mid-length, 75 percent on short text

Mid-length text (200 to 500 words) lands at roughly 82 percent. Short text under 200 words drops to roughly 75 percent because there is simply not enough statistical signal for any classifier in the category to land confidently. The result panel surfaces a low-confidence flag on short text so you know to treat the score as suggestive rather than precise.

ESL false positives at 4 to 6 percent

Uncalibrated detectors typically score 8 to 12 percent false positives on ESL writing because simpler vocabulary and more uniform sentence structure overlap with how language models write. A calibration layer trained on roughly 600,000 ESL samples drops the rate to 4 to 6 percent. Native English false positives stay at 1 to 2 percent, the industry norm for the band. ESL calibration is on by default on the free tier.

No detector is 100 percent accurate

Any tool advertising 99 or 100 percent is quoting a best-case test set, not real-world performance. Treat the Authenticity Score as a calibrated signal, not a verdict. Pair it with the sentence-level highlights to see which paragraphs are driving the result, then make an editorial call from there. This page does not promise anything that detection cannot deliver.

Plans & pricing

Free is the start. Same model on every tier.

Three scans a day on free, unlimited on Pro. The classifier and the sentence-level evidence are identical. Yearly billing saves 25%.

Starter
$7.49/month

Billed $89.88/year — Save $30

For writers checking individual articles regularly.
  • 20 scans / day
  • 20,000 AI rewriter words/mo
  • Chrome extension
  • Email support
Get Starter
Pro
$14.99/month

Billed $179.88/year — Save $60

For teachers, editors, and creators auditing daily.
  • Unlimited scans
  • 50,000 AI rewriter words/mo
  • File & URL upload
  • Priority support
Get Pro
Business
$29.99/month

Billed $359.88/year — Save $120

For schools and teams running accuracy at scale.
  • 100,000 AI rewriter words/mo
  • REST API access
  • 5 team seats
  • White-label PDFs
Get Business

Yearly billing saves 25%. View full pricing →

30-second workflow

Four steps from paste to defensible call.

The free tier is designed so a single scan runs end to end in about thirty seconds on an 800-word essay, with no signup gate before your first result.

1. Paste up to 5,000 characters

Open app.textsight.ai. Paste up to 5,000 characters into the detector tab. The character counter ticks as you type or paste, and no signup is required before your first scan. Three scans a day means you can run three independent texts through the same workflow before the daily cap applies.

2. See the Authenticity Score

Click Scan. The full classifier runs in roughly six seconds on short text and thirty seconds on an 800-word essay. The result panel returns a 0 to 100 Authenticity Score, the five-band confidence label (Original, Mostly Human, Mixed, Likely AI, AI Generated), and the Plagiarism Risk indicator on the same scan.

3. Read the sentence-level highlights

Open the per-sentence panel. Every green sentence reads human. Every yellow sentence is borderline. Every red sentence is flagged AI with the specific signals that triggered it listed alongside. The highlights are the evidence that turns a calibrated score into a call you can defend in a conversation with a student, editor, or freelancer.

4. Decide, or scan again tomorrow

Use the highlights to edit, escalate, or move on. If the score is borderline and you need more confidence, scan a second draft after editing the red sentences. The free tier is generous enough for genuine pre-submission work, and the upgrade path to Pro is open the moment three scans a day is not enough.

Honest caveats

Why most free detectors feel inaccurate.

Three structural reasons explain why most of the free results returned by a "free AI detector" search feel unactionable in real use.

Lightweight free-only classifiers

Tools funded entirely through ads run lighter classifiers on the free tier because a full transformer per scan costs real money. Lighter classifiers trained on GPT-3.5 era data have not kept up with GPT-4, Claude 3, and Gemini outputs, so the percentage they return is often noise. TextSight keeps the same classifier on free that Pro uses, because the free tier is paid for by Pro subscriptions rather than by the result page itself.

No sentence-level evidence on free

Most free detectors return a single score. A score with no per-sentence colour map tells you the number, not the reason. A 65 percent "AI" reading with no underlying signal is impossible to act on, and that is the experience most "free AI detector" search results deliver. TextSight Free includes sentence-level highlights on every scan because evidence is the difference between a usable score and a number you cannot defend.

Ad-heavy result pages

Banner ads above the highlights, upsell prompts pasted over the score, interstitial ads when the result loads, and aggressive newsletter modals are standard on ad-funded free detectors. The result page itself is the product they monetize, which is why the actual highlights feel cramped. TextSight Free is funded by paid tiers, not ads, so the result panel stays clean.

FAQ

Free accuracy questions people actually ask.

Is the free AI detector actually accurate?
The free tier runs the same classifier as Pro. Accuracy bands match within rounding: roughly 89 percent on long-form text of 500 words or more, roughly 82 percent on mid-length text of 200 to 500 words, and roughly 75 percent on short text under 200 words. False-positive rates of 1 to 2 percent on native English and 4 to 6 percent on ESL writing apply to every free scan equally. Free is not a stripped-down model.
What does the free tier include?
Three scans a day, 5,000 characters per scan, sentence-level highlights on every scan, and a Plagiarism Risk indicator alongside the Authenticity Score. No card and no email are required for your first scan. Most free competitors hide sentence-level evidence behind paid plans, so the included highlights are the differentiator that makes the free tier usable as real evidence rather than a single number.
Why do most free detectors feel inaccurate?
Two reasons. First, lightweight free classifiers trained on GPT-3.5 only have not kept up with GPT-4, Claude, and Gemini outputs. Second, most free tools return a single percentage with no sentence-level evidence, so a 65 percent score with no underlying signal feels like guesswork. TextSight uses the same multi-model classifier on free that Pro uses, and surfaces the sentence-level evidence behind the score on every free scan.
Are sentence-level highlights really free?
Yes. Every free scan returns the same per-sentence colour highlights that Pro returns. Green for human, yellow for borderline, red for AI. The highlights are how a calibrated score becomes a defensible call: instead of seeing a global percentage you cannot act on, you see exactly which sentences drove it. That is the difference between a result you can edit from and a result you can only complain about.
Is the free detector accurate on ESL writing?
Yes, calibrated against ESL samples. An ESL calibration layer trained on roughly 600,000 non-native English writing samples reduces ESL false positives by about 40 percent versus uncalibrated detectors. Native English false-positive rate stays at 1 to 2 percent, and ESL false-positive rate drops from the industry-typical 8 to 12 percent down to 4 to 6 percent on TextSight. ESL calibration is included on the free tier, not a paid upgrade.
How is the score calibrated?
The Authenticity Score is plotted on a five-band scale from 0 to 100. Original (80 to 100), Mostly Human (60 to 79), Mixed (40 to 59), Likely AI (20 to 39), AI Generated (0 to 19). The bands are calibrated confidence ranges, not verdicts. Sentence-level highlights pair with the global score so a reviewer can see which paragraphs are driving the band and make a judgement rather than treating any single number as the final answer.
Why only 3 free scans a day?
Running the full multi-model classifier on every scan has real compute cost. Three scans a day at 5,000 characters each cover most genuine free use cases: pre-submission essay check, freelance deliverable review, a quick sanity scan on a short article. Heavier daily use is what the paid tiers fund, which in turn is what keeps the free tier honest and accurate rather than dropping in a cheaper free-only model.
Is the result page free of ads?
Yes. The result page on TextSight shows the score, the sentence-level highlights, and the Plagiarism Risk indicator with no banner ads, no interstitials, and no upsell prompts pasted over the highlights. Most ad-funded free detectors monetize the result page itself, which is why their result panels feel cramped. TextSight Free is funded by paid tiers, not ads, which keeps the result page clean.
Related

More on free and accurate detection.

Run a free accurate scan. See the evidence.

Same classifier as Pro on every free scan, sentence-level highlights included, ESL calibrated. Three scans a day, no card, no email needed for your first scan.

Run a free accurate scan See pricing
Same classifier as Pro · Sentence-level evidence on free · ESL calibrated