This is a free AI humanizer with no login step: paste a paragraph, get a rewrite back, create nothing. Three rewrites a day, up to 260 words each, no account and no card. The result comes back with a before and after AI score from our own detector and the changed words highlighted, so you can see what moved rather than taking our word for it.
The rest of this page is the part most "no login" pages leave out: what the anonymous limit is actually counted against, what we hold while you are not logged in, and the two situations where staying anonymous works against you.
These are the live anonymous numbers, not a trial that expires.
Three rewrites a day, up to 260 words per humanization. It resets daily rather than being a one-off trial, so you can come back tomorrow and have three more. There is no card step and no email step before the first result.
Each rewrite returns three things: the rewritten passage, an AI score before and after from our own detector with the reading labelled as ours, and a highlight of the words that changed. That last part is the one worth using. A rewrite that softens a finding or moves a number is the real risk in this kind of tool, and you cannot catch it in prose you have only skim-read.
The detector runs anonymously too, on its own allowance: three scans a day at up to 1,000 words. So you can check a passage, rewrite it, and check it again without an account, though those are two separate daily allowances rather than one pool.
It is a per-request cap, not a daily total. Three separate 260-word rewrites is the shape, rather than one 900-word run. For most people that is a paragraph or two at a time, which is also the scale at which you will genuinely read every change instead of scrolling past them.
If you need to work on something longer in one pass, that is the thing a plan buys rather than something hidden behind a signup. The plans page carries the current per-request sizes.
Worth knowing, because it explains the one confusing failure.
With no account there is nothing to attach a quota to except your network address, so the anonymous allowance is keyed to your IP. That mostly behaves the way you expect, and it has one consequence people hit and find baffling: on a shared network the allowance can be shared. University wifi, an office, a library or a phone network behind carrier NAT can all put many people behind one address.
So if you are told you are out of rewrites and you know you have not used three, that is usually why. It is not a bug and it is not us counting wrong. Signing in gives you your own allowance instead of the one your network is sharing, which is the actual fix.
Clearing cookies or opening a private window does not reset it, because the count was never in a cookie. We would rather say that than let you waste ten minutes trying.
The reason most people want the no-login route in the first place.
Anonymous use has no account to attach a history to, so there is no saved document list and nothing for you to come back to. The passage is processed to produce the rewrite and the score. We are not going to recite a retention period on this page that I cannot show you in our own policy, so the honest pointer is the privacy policy, which is the document that actually governs it.
What I can tell you plainly about the product: the rewrite is sent to a model to be processed, because that is how it works. Anyone telling you a humanizer runs entirely on your own device is describing a different product. If a passage is confidential enough that it must not leave your machine, no cloud humanizer is the right tool, ours included.
If you are being accused of using AI. Do not rewrite the draft. The thing that defends you is your version history, and a rewrite damages it. What to gather instead is a different job from this page.
If you need the work again later. Anonymous leaves you no record. If you are iterating on a chapter over a week, an account is the only way to have the earlier versions still there.
Light varies sentence rhythm and cuts connective filler, and leaves your vocabulary alone. It is the one to use wherever the wording is load-bearing: a methods section, a legal sentence, anything with a number in it. Balanced edits phrasing more broadly and is the sensible default for ordinary prose. Maximum replaces most of the wording; it is a paid mode, and the free tier covers Light and Balanced per our published plans.
Heavier is not better. The more wording a pass replaces, the more chances it has to move a claim, and anonymously you have three rewrites rather than unlimited retries to notice. Starting at Light and stepping up is cheaper than starting at Maximum and reading carefully enough to catch a drifted finding.
One thing we will not claim: that any mode makes text pass a specific checker. We score with our own detector and label it as ours. No vendor, us included, can see Turnitin's verdict on your document, so a published bypass rate is a number someone made up. Keeping the meaning intact is the part you can actually verify.
Yes. You can rewrite a passage here without an account or a card: three humanizations a day, up to 260 words each, with the before and after AI score and the changed words shown. It resets daily rather than being a one-off trial. The detector runs anonymously on its own separate allowance of three scans a day at up to 1,000 words.
Three a day, each up to 260 words. The 260 is a per-request cap rather than a daily total, so it is three separate short rewrites rather than one long one. The allowance resets each day. Signing in gives you your own allowance of 3 actions a day, shared between scans and rewrites, and a saved history; the current per-request sizes for each plan are on the plans page.
Almost always because the anonymous allowance is keyed to your network address, and you are on a shared one. University wifi, an office network, a library or a phone network behind carrier NAT can put many people behind a single address, so the three can be spent by someone else. Clearing cookies or using a private window will not reset it, because the count was never stored in your browser. Signing in gives you your own allowance.
There is no account for us to attach a history to, so nothing is saved for you to return to. The passage is processed to produce the rewrite and the score, and what governs retention is our privacy policy rather than a number I would quote at you here. The practical point: the text is sent to a model to be processed, so any passage confidential enough that it must not leave your machine is not a fit for a cloud humanizer, ours included.
No. The humanizer box takes pasted text, so a file upload is not part of the anonymous route. Our detector does accept document upload, which is a separate tool with its own allowance. For a long document the workable pattern is to score the document first, then paste in just the paragraphs that need rewriting, which is also cheaper in quota than rewriting the whole thing.
Using one is not the risk; the risk is what you do with the output. Two rules matter. If you are already under suspicion, do not rewrite the draft at all, because your version history is the evidence that defends you and a rewrite damages it. And read the highlighted changes rather than trusting the rewrite, because a softened claim or a moved number leaves your citations supporting something your sources did not say. Your institution rules on whether the use itself is permitted, not us.
What staying anonymous actually costs you, and when signing up is the right call.
Read the trade-off →The detector side of the same question: three scans a day, no account.
Check a passage →The check that matters more than the score, with a worked example.
See the method →Longer passages, your own allowance and a saved history.
Compare plans →Three rewrites a day, up to 260 words, no account and no card. The before and after score and the changed words come with it.