Rewriting AI content is not the same task as score reduction on a detector. The detector measures patterns; your reader measures voice. A real rewrite has to handle both, and the way to do that is to stop thinking about word swaps and start thinking about the four structural patterns every AI draft carries. Inside: a five-step workflow built on the detector and AI rewriter, the four patterns that reward a manual pass (tripled adjectives, uniform sentence rhythm, corporate vocabulary, transition phrase clustering), a decision tree for choosing between hand-editing and the AI rewriter, the three AI rewriter modes and when each one fits, and a short list of the specifics only you can add. By the end you should know what to fix yourself, what to delegate, and what the detector is actually scoring as you go.
The order matters. Detect first so the rewrite has a target. Identify before you change anything so the fix addresses the actual pattern. Rewrite priority sentences by hand. Run the AI rewriter on what remains. Re-detect at the end so you know whether the voice now reads as yours.
Paste the draft into TextSight at app.textsight.ai. You get an overall 0 to 100 AI score, a per-sentence highlight map, and a bundled Plagiarism Risk score in the same scan. Capture both numbers and screenshot the highlight map; you will compare the before and after at the end. A 95 percent score is normal for an untouched ChatGPT or Claude draft. Rewriting without first detecting is rewriting blind: you waste time polishing sentences the detector did not flag and miss the ones that carry the pattern signature.
Walk the highlight map sentence by sentence. For each red sentence, label which of the four patterns it triggers: tripled adjectives, uniform rhythm, corporate vocabulary on delve or tapestry or navigate or underscore, or transition phrase clustering. A single red sentence usually carries one or two patterns at most. Labelling forces you to look at structure rather than read for vibes, and it tells you exactly what the rewrite needs to change. Skip this step and you end up changing sentences that were already fine.
Rewrite each load-bearing sentence by hand against the pattern you labelled. Tripled adjectives collapse to one concrete adjective or get replaced by a specific example. Uniform rhythm gets broken by merging two 18-word sentences into one 30-word sentence followed by a five-word punchline. Corporate vocabulary swaps for plain verbs and nouns: leverage becomes use, navigate metaphorically becomes work through, underscore becomes show. Transition openers like Furthermore and Moreover usually delete cleanly. The manual pass is slow but it keeps judgement on the sentences that carry meaning.
For long drafts where the manual pass would take longer than the writing is worth, or for transitional sections that still flag after a hand-edit, run the remainder through the TextSight AI rewriter. Pick the mode that matches the gap between the current draft and where you want it to land (covered in the modes section below). Treat the AI rewriter output as another draft to read, not a finished answer. Read it through, accept what reads as yours, reject what drifts from your meaning, fix the rest by hand.
Run the rewritten draft back through the detector. Compare the new score and highlight map to the starting screenshot. A genuine rewrite usually brings 95 percent down into the 20 to 45 percent band with scattered residual highlights rather than clusters. If clusters remain, repeat steps two through four on those specific sections only. Finally, layer in the names, dates, anecdotes, and lived details only you can add. This last pass does not move the score much, but it is what makes the voice read as yours rather than anyone's.
An AI rewriter can address all four, but the manual rewrite forces you to think about meaning, not just surface words. For short drafts and for the sections of long drafts that carry your argument, the hand pass is worth the time.
"A robust, comprehensive, multifaceted approach." Three adjectives in front of one noun is one of the cleanest AI signatures. The fix is rarely to keep all three. Either pick the single adjective that does the most work, or replace the stack with a specific example: instead of "a robust, comprehensive, multifaceted approach," write "an approach that catches both the obvious cases and the edge cases." The specific example carries meaning the adjective stack only gestured at, and the score drops because the structural pattern is gone.
If every sentence in a paragraph lands between 16 and 22 words, the burstiness signal is low and the paragraph reads AI even when the vocabulary is clean. The fix is to vary length deliberately. Take two adjacent 18-word sentences and merge them into one 30-word sentence; follow it with a five-word punchline that lands the point. Then leave the next two short sentences alone. The goal is variation, not uniformity in the other direction. Human writing has short sentences next to long ones, and the contrast is what carries voice.
Frontier models have favourite words in 2026: delve, robust, leverage as a verb, navigate used metaphorically, underscore, showcase, myriad, tapestry, multifaceted, foster, holistic. Two or three of these in a 500-word section is statistically unusual for natural writing. The fix is a straight swap to plain English. Delve becomes look at or examine. Tapestry becomes pattern or mix or layering. Leverage becomes use. Navigate metaphorically becomes work through or handle. Underscore becomes show or emphasise. The swap is mechanical but the effect on the reading voice is large.
Furthermore, Moreover, In addition, Additionally, In conclusion. ChatGPT stacks these at paragraph boundaries to signal flow. Human writers usually trust the paragraph break itself to carry the transition. The fix is often to delete the opener entirely with no replacement; the sentence underneath stands on its own once the scaffold is removed. If the transition genuinely needs a connector, swap to a concrete one tied to what came before: "Those two patterns are the easy ones to catch. The third is harder because" works as a transition without any furniture phrase.
Both tools have a place and the dividing line is mostly about length and stakes. A 200-word email rewards the manual rewrite; a 2,000-word essay with five sections does not. Here is the working rule of thumb.
For anything under about 400 words, the manual rewrite is faster, cleaner, and produces a voice closer to yours than any AI rewriter pass. The reason is that you spend the time you would have spent setting up the tool actually reading the sentences, which is the part that matters. A short email, a short LinkedIn post, a one-paragraph reply to a reviewer, a single-page memo: rewrite by hand, no AI rewriter in the loop. The detector pass is still worth running as a verification step at the end.
For drafts over about 1,000 words, full manual rewriting usually takes longer than the writing is worth. The working approach is to identify the two or three sections that carry your argument and rewrite those by hand, then run the transitional and background sections through the AI rewriter. This keeps your judgement on the load-bearing parts of the piece and delegates the polish on the structural connective tissue. A 2,000-word essay might end up with 600 words of careful hand-edit and 1,400 words of AI rewriter-assist plus a quick read-through.
Between 400 and 1,000 words the choice depends on what the piece is for. A blog post for your own newsletter where voice is the whole product gets the manual rewrite. A specification document where the goal is clarity and the voice is professional-neutral gets the AI rewriter with a quick manual read after. A cover letter that needs to sound like you in your best voice gets the manual pass. A weekly status report gets the AI rewriter. The rule is to spend the rewriting time where the voice carries the most weight.
Free includes 3 detector scans a day and a 1,500-word AI rewriter quota. Paid tiers raise the quotas and add the Chrome extension, file upload, and REST API. Yearly billing saves 25%.
Billed $89.88/year — Save $30
Billed $179.88/year — Save $60
Billed $359.88/year — Save $120
Yearly billing saves 25%. View full pricing
The TextSight AI rewriter offers three intensity modes. Picking the right one matters because the wrong mode either leaves the AI rhythm intact or rewrites so aggressively the meaning drifts. Start with Standard, then move up or down based on what you read in the output.
Light keeps the prose close to the original. Use it on drafts where you already wrote a chunk yourself and used AI for tightening or grammar polish; the underlying voice is yours and only the surface needs a quiet wash. Light typically moves the detector score by 15 to 25 points and preserves more of the original phrasing than the other modes. It is the right choice when the risk of the AI rewriter drifting from your meaning is higher than the cost of a slightly residual AI signal.
Standard rewrites more aggressively while still keeping the structure of the draft intact. It is the right starting point for most rewriting sessions because it handles the four patterns (tripled adjectives, uniform rhythm, corporate vocabulary, transition clusters) without rewriting the argument. Standard usually moves the score by 35 to 55 points on a heavy AI draft. If the output drifts from your meaning, drop to Light; if the score still clusters red, escalate to Maximum on the remaining sections.
Maximum rewrites the most, replacing structure and phrasing while attempting to keep the ideas. It is right for ChatGPT or Claude output where the underlying analysis is what you want and the prose is what you do not. Maximum typically moves the score by 50 to 70 points. The trade-off is that the rewrite sometimes paraphrases a specific point into something more general, so a manual read-through after Maximum is non-negotiable. Reserve this mode for sections rather than whole drafts.
The sibling guide focused on editing rather than rewriting. Same four patterns, different emphasis.
Open the editing guideThe tool itself. Three modes, sentence-level diff view, free quota every day with no card.
Open the AI rewriterHow the 0-to-100 metric is computed and what each tier means for graded or published work.
Read the guideThe prevention angle: how to draft from scratch so the rewrite step is unnecessary.
Open the prevention guideDetector, AI rewriter, and sentence-level highlights in one workflow. Free to try with no card. 3 detector scans and 1,500 AI rewriter words on the free tier, every day.