Humaniser is an AI humanizer: you paste text a detector flagged, it rewrites the text so detectors stop flagging it. Before you pick a replacement, work out whether you want another tool that does that, or a tool that does the opposite and tells you what a detector sees. Those are separate products.
Paste some text or load the example to estimate AI likelihood.
All figures below were read from humaniser.com's own pages on 16 August 2026.
The homepage headline is "Free AI Humanizer - Make AI Text Sound Human & Bypass AI Detectors", and the product is described as converting text from ChatGPT, Gemini and Claude into "natural, undetectable human writing". The site names eight detectors it targets: GPTZero, Turnitin, Originality.AI, Copyleaks, Winston AI, ZeroGPT, Content at Scale and Sapling. It claims a "99.8% AI Detection Bypass Rate" and a "99.8% pass rate on Turnitin". Those are Humaniser's claims about Humaniser, published on its own homepage. We have not tested them and do not repeat them as fact.
The pricing page carries four tiers plus a custom enterprise option:
| Plan | Annual rate | Monthly rate | Daily runs | Input limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | $0 | 3 | 200 words, English only |
| Basic | $5/mo, billed $60 annually | $10/mo | 15 | 500 words |
| Pro | $10/mo, billed $120 annually | $20/mo | 50 | 1,000 words |
| Max | $20/mo, billed $240 annually | $40/mo | Unlimited | Unlimited |
| Enterprise | Custom, contact form | Custom | Custom | Custom |
Basic and above add "Max Model" access, all languages, and faster email support. The pricing page also displays a "50% Off Ends In" countdown, which was reading 00 Hr : 00 Min : 00 Sec at the time of checking while the discounted prices were still shown.
Humaniser publishes a money-back guarantee in its own words: "if anything we produce is flagged as not human, we will refund the cost of humanization."
The terms of service name Humaniser LTD as the contracting party and carry a "Last Updated: 07 October 2025" date. Support is support@humaniser.com. The about page describes a "remote-first team operating across North America, Europe, and Southeast Asia" and states "We never store the text you process." No individual is named and no registered address is published on the pages we read. Legal pages sit at /terms-of-service and /privacy-policy; the shorter /terms and /privacy URLs return 404, which matters only if you have one of those bookmarked.
Humaniser's site includes an AI Detector alongside the rewriter. We called its scoring endpoint directly on 16 August 2026 with three different passages and it responded every time, in under a second, with per sentence probabilities.
It does discriminate. A deliberately loose, conversational human passage scored 0 and came back HUMAN_ONLY. A passage stuffed with "In conclusion", "multifaceted", "leverage synergies" and "facilitate optimal outcomes" scored 100 and came back AI_ONLY. A third, milder passage scored 10. So the detector runs and it is not a stub.
Two observations worth knowing before you rely on it. First, the scores clustered hard at the extremes across our small sample: 0, 10 and 100, with no middle. Second, the human readable summary did not always match the machine classification. The passage classified AI_ONLY at confidence 100 was returned with the summary text "Your Text contains mixed signals, with some parts generated by AI/GPT", and one passage classified HUMAN_ONLY at confidence 0 carried that same mixed signals summary. That is a display inconsistency in their response payload, observed on three of four test calls. We are reporting what the endpoint returned, not inferring anything about the model behind it.
The rewriting endpoint itself is session gated. Called from outside a browser it returns HTTP 403 with "Session verification failed. Please refresh the page and try again." That is a sensible abuse control, not a fault, and it means we did not exercise the rewriter and make no claim about its output quality.
cognibypass.com, a separate bypass tool, carries an outbound link to humaniser.com/?utm_source=cognibypass. That is a tagged referral link and it is a fact you can see in cognibypass.com's HTML. We checked whether the two sites share copy by searching cognibypass.com for five distinctive Humaniser strings, including "3 uses daily", "200-word input limit" and "Money back guarantee". None appeared. The two sites use different brand names, different page structures and different pricing models. Beyond the one tagged link, we found nothing connecting them, and we draw no conclusion about who runs either.
If your goal is to make flagged text stop being flagged, Humaniser is built for that and TextSight is not. Do not switch to us for that job, because you will be disappointed.
Specifically, stay with Humaniser, or move to a comparable humanizer, if:
TextSight sells the measurement, not the evasion. The paste box at the top of this page runs the same detector our paying customers use. You get a score from 0 to 100 with three bands: under 30 reads as likely human written, 30 to 69 as mixed signals, 70 and above as likely AI generated. Minimum 25 words.
Anonymous checks are 3 per day, pooled across the AI Detector and the Document Detector, capped at 1,000 words. A free account raises that to 60 checks a day at 5,000 words, and every signed in scan is saved to your Scan History, free accounts included. Starter gets 200 a day; Pro and above are unlimited.
The detector is an English only ensemble of DeBERTa, RoBERTa and ELECTRA. It has a known false positive bias against writers who learned English as a second language, which is the single most important thing to know if you are being accused rather than accusing. We publish that because it changes how you should read a high score, not because it is flattering.
Paid features, for completeness: sentence level analysis and PDF export from Starter; file upload, URL scan and bulk scan; Chrome extension and REST API from Pro; teams and branded reports from Business.
Pricing is $9.99 a month for Starter, $19.99 for Pro, $39.99 for Business, $79.99 for Enterprise. Annual billing is 25 percent off, so $7.49, $14.99, $29.99 and $59.99 respectively.
The deeper head-to-head: feature table, where GPTZero wins, where TextSight wins, and migration steps.
Read the comparePerplexity, burstiness, and transformer scoring explained, so you can read any detector's verdict critically.
Read the guideWhy detectors over-flag ESL and formal writing, and how sentence-level evidence helps you defend real work.
Read the guideThe full ranking with detection approach, pricing, and use-case fit side by side.
See the rankingStart with TextSight's free tier. No card, no signup, no commitment. Your first scan in about six seconds, with the evidence shown line by line.
Honest comparisons vs other tools.