The number people compare when they shop for a Bypass AI replacement is words per month. The number that ruins their week is words per input. Bypass AI publishes both, and they are very different constraints. Here is what its own pricing page says, what its refund window allows, and where TextSight belongs.
Paste some text or load the example to estimate AI likelihood.
Every plan on bypassai.ai/pricing carries a monthly word pool and a separate cap on how much text you can submit in a single go. Checked 16 August 2026:
| Plan | Monthly | Words per month | Words max per input |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | 100 | 100 |
| Basic | $9.99 USD/mo | 3,000 | 500 |
| Pro | $19.99 USD/mo | 30,000 | 1,500 |
| Unlimited | see below | Unlimited | Unlimited |
Yearly billing is cheaper per month: the same page shows Basic at $6.99 USD/mo and Pro at $9.99 USD/mo when the Yearly tab is selected, with a "Limited Time Offer: 30% OFF" strip across the page.
The Unlimited card rendered its price as "- /mo" on both tabs when we checked. The product data embedded in that same page lists Unlimited at 6999 cents monthly and 11988 cents yearly, and records its monthly usage figure as 3,000,000 words rather than a true absence of a ceiling.
If you write in 2,000 word chunks, Basic and Pro are not usable as written; you will be splitting every document. That is the single most common reason people go looking for an alternative in this category, and it is worth checking on any replacement before you pay, because per input caps are widespread.
The homepage states "Make your AI text 100% undetectable with BypassAI", and advertises a "99.7% Pass Rate", a "94.6%+ Satisfaction Rate" and "Chosen by 2M+ Students & Writers" (bypassai.ai, checked 16 August 2026). It names GPTZero, Originality.ai, ZeroGPT, Turnitin, Winston AI, Content at Scale and Copyleaks as targets, and lists over 30 supported languages including Arabic, Bengali, Chinese, Hindi, Japanese, Korean, Tamil, Thai and Ukrainian.
Those are the vendor's claims, reported as theirs. Nobody has run these tools against a shared, published benchmark, so a pass rate on one vendor's site cannot be compared with a pass rate on another's. Treat all of them as marketing until an independent test exists.
Bypass AI's refund policy requires that "you must express your dissatisfaction and submit your request within 3 days (72 hours) from the date of purchase", and that your word usage has not exceeded 1,000 words (bypassai.ai/refund-policy, checked 16 August 2026). Requests go by email and are processed within three business days of confirmation.
Read that against the plan table. On Basic, 1,000 words is a third of the monthly allowance and two full inputs. So the practical test window is small: buy, run two documents, decide inside 72 hours. If you are evaluating a replacement, run your hardest document first, not your easiest.
Worth noting for anyone comparing across this category: Humanizer.org publishes a refund policy with the same two conditions, three days and 1,000 words (humanizer.org/refund, checked 16 August 2026). If you are testing several tools, you are working to the same clock on both.
The homepage says "BypassAI offers every new user free words to humanize AI text" without a number, and the pricing FAQ says "Yes! BypassAI offers a free plan that allows you to try out its powerful humanization technology with no costs" (bypassai.ai and bypassai.ai/pricing, checked 16 August 2026). Neither states a figure in the visible copy.
The page's own product list records the Free plan at 100 words per month with a 100 word per request limit, and a separate anonymous entry at 0 words. The signup bonus is rendered from a variable, so it is set server side rather than published. If the exact free allowance matters, sign up and read the counter rather than trusting a headline.
If your job is to reduce a detector score on text you have already generated, Bypass AI is designed for exactly that and TextSight is not. This is a difference in purpose, not a gap in our feature list, and we are not going to pretend otherwise.
Stay with Bypass AI if:
We build the detector. The rewriter we ship is aimed at clarity: shorter sentences, fewer hedges, less filler. It is not tuned to move a score and we publish no pass rate, because a pass rate is not a claim we want to make or defend.
That makes us useful to the person on the other end of the transaction. Instructors who need to triage a stack of submissions before a conversation. Editors who commission from freelancers and want a first pass on delivery. Compliance and content teams who need a document, not a vibe.
Two things you should hold against us. Our detector is English only, an ensemble of DeBERTa, RoBERTa and ELECTRA. And it has a known false positive bias against writers who learned English as a second language, which matters enormously if a score might be used to accuse someone. A high band is a prompt to ask questions. It is not evidence.
| Plan | Monthly | Annual (25% off) |
|---|---|---|
| Starter | $9.99 | $7.49/mo |
| Pro | $19.99 | $14.99/mo |
| Business | $39.99 | $29.99/mo |
| Enterprise | $79.99 | $59.99/mo |
We meter checks per day rather than words per month. The paste box above works with no account at 3 checks a day, pooled across the AI Detector and Document Detector, up to 1,000 words. A free account gives 60 checks a day at 5,000 words with history. Starter is 200 checks a day. Pro and above are unlimited. Minimum input is 25 words. Bands: under 30 likely human written, 30 to 69 mixed signals, 70 and above likely AI generated.
Sentence level analysis and PDF export from Starter. Chrome extension and REST API from Pro. Teams and branded reports from Business. File upload, URL scan and bulk scan included.
Do not test with sample text. Take the longest real document you handle and try to submit it whole. If the tool refuses, you have learned the most important thing about it in ten seconds.
Then decide which question you are answering. "Make this score lower" points you at Bypass AI and its direct competitors, compared on per input cap and refund window. "Tell me what this scores and why, in a form I can hand to someone" points you here.
The deeper head-to-head: feature table, where GPTZero wins, where TextSight wins, and migration steps.
Read the comparePerplexity, burstiness, and transformer scoring explained, so you can read any detector's verdict critically.
Read the guideWhy detectors over-flag ESL and formal writing, and how sentence-level evidence helps you defend real work.
Read the guideThe full ranking with detection approach, pricing, and use-case fit side by side.
See the rankingStart with TextSight's free tier. No card, no signup, no commitment. Your first scan in about six seconds, with the evidence shown line by line.
Honest comparisons vs other tools.